|
Nikon Prostaff 4x32mm RimFire Classic Scope | 
| Brand: Nikon
Category: Sports
Department: Mounts
Buy New: $89.00 - $159.77 (On sale from $248.99)
as of 9/9/2010 09:15 MDT details
The Hunter Hut
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Amazon.com
Usually ships in 24 hours
Sports Warehouse  896 reviews
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
OneClickShooting 163 reviews
Usually ships in 2-3 business days
Ambient Weather 2050 reviews
Usually ships in 3-4 business days
Rating:  9 reviews
Sales Rank: 31002
Shipping Weight (lbs): 2.2
Dimensions (in): 11.2 x 0 x 0
MPN: 6305
UPC: 018208063055
EAN: 0018208063055
ASIN: B000B8LLV8
| |
| |
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
0
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 9
Nikon Prostaff 4x32mm RimFire Classic Scope August 23, 2010
Marco Polo (Jackson MI)
This scope is SPECTACULAR! I have never had a scope that is as bright and clear as this Nikon is. The price and delivery was great too. I would recommend this scope for any rimfire firearm.
 Scope is great...but the mounting hardware is junk July 1, 2010
Adam Kowal (Boston, MA)
0 out of 3 found this review helpful
I bought this scope for my 10/22. Installs easy and is a simple to use as any other scope. It is crystal clear and bright. everything you want in a scope like this. BUT...the scope and rings loosen from the mounting plate while shooting...even if they are tightened accordingly...the scope slides foward. So if you value the rings as part of the value..they aren't worth much.
Just what I needed June 18, 2010
Ann Geisert (Chicago, IL)
I couldn't find this scope at any gun shops or sporting goods stores in my area, so I was very pleased to be able to order it through Amazon. It was the right size and mounted easily.
 Scope received defective April 29, 2010
Rodney Davis (North Georgia)
1 out of 3 found this review helpful
Received the Nikon Prostaff 4X32 Rimfire classic scope today. It's boxed back up and is being returned as defective. Looked forward to receiving one of these after all the good reviews. Unfortunately I turned out to be the "Quality Control Checker" for the manufacturer. That is truly a sickness that has invaded just about every manufacturer on the planet. No one bothers checking their own products before shoving them out the door and on to unsuspecting customers. When I took the covers off the scope and looked through it, there was debris hanging from the crosshairs. I rotated the scope but the debris did not move. It could be internal scratches, or just debris. Whatever it is, it's going back for replacement. Hopefully someone will take the time to look through the replacement I am getting.
Best overall value in .22 scope March 10, 2010
Randy See (None)
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
I ordered the Nikon ProStaff rimfire 4x32 (black) and a Bushnell Banner 4x32 at the same time. I had purchased Nikons primarily in the past, but have recently added a few Bushnells based on a local gun store's recommendations. Leupolds give me more of a parallax problem than these brands, but that's likely my eyesight. I have a Ruger 9mm carbine that came with a very low-end Tasco scope that I've tolerated too long. I recently bought a Sig 522 and wanted to put a close range .22 scope on it. I bought both to do a comparison, then decide which (if either) would go on each gun. Both scopes are about the same dimensions. Neither poses a mounting problem. The Nikon comes with the rings, the Bushnell doesn't. The Bushnell is every bit as bright and clear as the Nikon--for about $30 less. Both adjust well for focus (mid-age eyes here) but the Nikon has a ring that backs up against the adjusted eyepiece to lock it in place. Eye relief really isn't much of an issue with such low powered firearms. Still, the Nikon gives about three generous inches of relief.
The sighting reticle on the Nikon is not specified in the Amazon ad. This seems to be a problem with most of the lower end scope descriptions on Amazon. Mine came with the multi-X reticle (sideways X that thins near the center). This is a fine reticle for .22 work (or my 9mm carbine). The .22, much more than the 9mm in my comparison of scopes and carbines, wants a precise view to plink or hunt small game. I prefer the multi-X for this.
I like the Bushnell and I'm keeping it (and reviewed it at the same time as this). It's on the 9mm carbine. The Nikon positively locks the eyepiece and the 522 gets handed between eager family members and friends but comes back to me unaltered. The Bushnell gets twisted (adjusted) easily for everyone. (Can you see who would like either and why? One of the two may be an advantage to you.) The Nikon's included scope mounting rings dilute the $30 savings on the Bushnell some. The provided lens covers came with one cap "chipped" so that a piece of it about 1/4 the size of the cap was loose in the bag around the scope. I couldn't see any signs of damage but I wondered if it had been dropped at the factory (as the unit was sealed, yet had this slight damage). If it was dropped, there was no negative result in the scope. But it does make pause a little to think that the quality control is not a better than to include a broken piece--even if it is small. (The box had no damage and the packing was very good so it most likely happened in pre-packaging.) I like the Nikon better, all things considered. But my study of each reminded me to look at other brands of scopes in a similar price range before settling on one. If you're not new to scopes, you may already have a favorite brand and hesitate to stray. But if you're newer--or new to the value segment of the scope market--you won't be embarrassed by these (even if you have a Bender and Schmidt on your custom silhouette tack-driver).
Showing reviews 1-5 of 9
|
|
|
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME. Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |
